Digital Assets & Virtual Assets
RWA Tokenisation in Hong Kong: Legal Framework and Structuring Guide

Guarantees are among the most common and commercially important documents in Hong Kong business and finance. Whether securing a loan, a commercial lease, a trade finance facility, or a contractual obligation, guarantees are routinely called upon to provide lenders and counterparties with the comfort of a creditworthy backstop. Yet guarantees are also frequently misunderstood, and their legal effects — particularly for individual guarantors — can be severe. This guide explains the key legal concepts, requirements, and practical considerations for guarantees and surety agreements in Hong Kong.
A guarantee is a promise by one person (the guarantor or surety) to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another person (the principal debtor) to a third party (the creditor or beneficiary). It is a secondary obligation: it arises only when the principal debtor fails to perform its own primary obligation.
A guarantee must be distinguished from an indemnity, which is a primary and independent obligation by the indemnifier to keep the creditor harmless against loss. The distinction matters because:
In practice, well-drafted commercial guarantee instruments often contain both guarantee and indemnity elements to maximise the creditor's protection.
Under Section 3 of the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) and the law inherited from the Statute of Frauds, a guarantee must be evidenced in writing and signed by the guarantor (or a person authorised by the guarantor in writing) to be enforceable. Purely oral guarantees are not enforceable in Hong Kong courts.
The writing requirement applies to the guarantee itself — not necessarily to the underlying obligation being guaranteed. However, in practice, both the underlying contract and the guarantee are documented in writing.
A guarantee (like any contract) requires consideration. The creditor's act of lending money, extending credit, or forbearing from suing the principal debtor typically constitutes sufficient consideration for the guarantee. Where a guarantee is given after the creditor's obligation has already been performed, care must be taken to ensure fresh consideration exists (e.g., the creditor agreeing to extend time for repayment).
While not a strict legal requirement for commercial guarantors (companies or sophisticated individuals), independent legal advice is strongly recommended — and often required by lenders — for individual personal guarantors, particularly in the context of:
The landmark case of Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No. 2) [2001] (followed in Hong Kong) established that a lender taking a guarantee from a non-commercial surety should ensure the surety has received independent legal advice on the nature and effect of the guarantee, or risk the guarantee being set aside for undue influence or misrepresentation.
A personal guarantee is given by an individual (typically a director or shareholder) in respect of a company's obligations. It is extremely common in SME lending, commercial leases, and trade finance. The guarantor's personal assets are exposed if the company defaults.
A corporate guarantee is given by one company (e.g., a holding company or affiliate) in respect of another company's obligations. Corporate guarantees must be authorised by the board of directors of the guarantor company, and care must be taken to ensure the guarantee is within the company's corporate capacity and does not constitute unlawful financial assistance for the acquisition of shares in the company (where relevant).
Unlike a traditional suretyship guarantee, an on-demand guarantee (or demand bond) requires the guarantor to pay upon the beneficiary's written demand, without the need to prove default by the principal debtor. On-demand guarantees are commonly used in construction projects (performance bonds, advance payment bonds) and international trade. They are primary obligations, not secondary ones, and the guarantor generally cannot refuse payment even if the underlying contract is disputed — unless fraud or clear and obvious unconscionability by the beneficiary is established.
A continuing guarantee covers a series of transactions over time (e.g., an overdraft facility or revolving credit line) rather than a single transaction. The guarantor remains liable for fluctuating balances up to the agreed limit unless and until the guarantee is revoked in accordance with its terms.
A limited (or capped) guarantee restricts the guarantor's liability to a specified maximum amount or specific obligations, rather than the entirety of the principal debtor's obligations. Negotiating a cap on liability is a key priority for individual guarantors.
A guarantor has several rights and potential defences that can discharge or reduce liability:
Any material variation of the terms of the underlying agreement between the creditor and the principal debtor — made without the guarantor's consent — will discharge the guarantor from liability (the rule in Holme v Brunskill (1878)). This applies unless the guarantee expressly preserves the creditor's right to vary the underlying agreement. Modern commercial guarantees typically contain such a provision.
If the creditor grants the principal debtor time to pay (a legally binding forbearance agreement) without the guarantor's consent, the guarantor is discharged. Again, modern guarantees typically exclude this rule by contract.
A guarantor may in some circumstances be entitled to assert set-off rights that the principal debtor has against the creditor. Whether this right is available depends on the terms of the guarantee and the nature of the set-off.
A guarantee obtained by misrepresentation or undue influence may be voidable. Personal guarantors who are in a relationship of trust and confidence with the principal debtor (e.g., spouses, family members) may have claims of undue influence if they were not independently advised.
If the underlying obligation is void, unenforceable, or has been fully performed, the guarantee (as a secondary obligation) may cease to be enforceable. The indemnity element of a combined guarantee/indemnity avoids this outcome.
Once the guarantor has paid the creditor in full, the guarantor is subrogated to the creditor's rights against the principal debtor — i.e., the guarantor steps into the creditor's shoes and can recover the amount paid from the principal debtor. This right arises automatically by law and need not be expressly provided for.
Where there are co-guarantors, each guarantor is entitled to seek contribution from the others in proportion to their respective shares of the liability. This right arises by equity even if the guarantors did not sign the same document.
A creditor seeking to enforce a guarantee in Hong Kong must establish:
Guarantee claims are typically litigated in the District Court (for claims up to HK$3 million) or the Court of First Instance (High Court) for larger amounts. Summary judgment under Order 14 is available for straightforward guarantee claims where the guarantor has no real defence. The limitation period for claims on a guarantee is generally 6 years from the date of breach (or demand where demand is required).
Landlords in Hong Kong frequently require personal guarantees from directors or shareholders of tenant companies, particularly for newly incorporated entities or where the tenant's financial standing is uncertain. Key issues in lease guarantees include:
Banks and financial institutions use guarantees extensively in:
In the banking context, guarantees are subject to the bank's standard terms and conditions, which typically contain extensive preservation clauses excluding common law defences and granting broad powers to the bank to deal with the principal debtor and security without affecting the guarantee.
Guarantees are powerful instruments that create significant personal and corporate risk. Whether you are a lender structuring a guarantee to protect your position, a business owner being asked to provide a personal guarantee, or a company asked to guarantee an affiliate's obligations, the legal issues are complex and the consequences of getting it wrong can be severe.
Alan Wong LLP advises on the drafting, negotiation, and enforcement of guarantees and surety instruments across all commercial sectors. Contact us to discuss your guarantee requirements.

A practical guide to having Hong Kong documents notarised and authenticated for use in Canada, covering the Hague Apostille Convention, province-specific requirements, common document types including immigration and real estate documents, and how Alan Wong LLP can help.

A comprehensive guide to equity fundraising mechanisms available to Hong Kong-listed companies under the HKEX Listing Rules, covering rights issues, open offers, top-up placements, general and specific mandates, and the key disclosure and shareholder approval requirements.