Digital Assets & Virtual Assets
RWA Tokenisation in Hong Kong: Legal Framework and Structuring Guide
A comprehensive guide to intellectual property licensing under Hong Kong law, covering trade mark licences, patent licences, copyright licences, software licence agreements, key contractual terms, royalty structures, sublicensing, termination rights, and competition law considerations.
Intellectual property ("IP") licensing is a cornerstone of the modern economy, enabling IP owners to generate revenue from their assets while allowing licensees to access valuable technology, brands, and creative works without the need for outright acquisition. In Hong Kong, IP licensing transactions span a wide spectrum — from multinational corporations licensing brand names and technology to regional distributors, to software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers licensing platforms to enterprise clients, to content creators licensing copyrights to streaming platforms.
This article provides an overview of the legal framework for IP licensing in Hong Kong, the key contractual terms in different types of IP licence, and the practical considerations that commonly arise in licence negotiations and management.
A registered trade mark owner (or registered user) may license the use of the trade mark to a licensee for specified goods or services, in a designated territory, and for a defined period. Trade mark licences in Hong Kong may be recorded with the Trade Marks Registry, which gives the licensee enhanced legal standing and public notice of the licence. Unregistered licences are valid between the parties but may not be enforceable against third parties.
Key trade mark licensing considerations include quality control — the trade mark owner must maintain meaningful oversight of the licensee's use of the mark to prevent the mark from losing its distinctiveness (a risk associated with so-called "naked licensing").
Patent licences authorise the licensee to make, use, sell, or import the patented invention in Hong Kong. Patent licences are governed by the Patents Ordinance (Cap. 514) and the underlying patent grant. Exclusive patent licences (where the owner grants rights to only one licensee to the exclusion of all others, including the owner itself) can be recorded with the Patents Registry and entitle the exclusive licensee to bring infringement proceedings in their own name.
Copyright in literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works; films; sound recordings; broadcasts; and typographical arrangements vests automatically in the creator under the Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528). The copyright owner may license some or all of the exclusive rights in a copyright work (reproduction, distribution, communication to the public, adaptation, etc.) to licensees. Copyright licences need not be in writing to be valid, though written licences are strongly advisable for clarity and enforceability.
Many IP licensing transactions also cover the transfer of confidential information and proprietary know-how (unregistered technical or commercial expertise). While know-how is not an intellectual property right per se (it is protected as a matter of contract and confidentiality law rather than as a registered right), its licensing is governed by contractual terms and the equitable duty of confidence.
The grant clause defines the scope of the licence: the specific IP rights licensed, whether the licence is exclusive (only the licensee may exercise the rights), sole (both the owner and the licensee may exercise them), or non-exclusive (the owner may grant the same rights to multiple parties). The territory of the licence (e.g., Hong Kong, Greater China, Asia-Pacific, worldwide) and the field of use (e.g., specific product categories, applications, or industries) should be clearly defined.
Royalties are the price paid by the licensee for the right to use the licensed IP. Royalty structures vary widely:
The licence agreement should specify whether the licensee is permitted to sublicense the licensed IP to third parties. Without an express right to sublicense, the licensee cannot grant sublicences. Where sublicensing is permitted, the agreement should require that sublicences are consistent with the terms of the head licence and that the licensee remains primarily liable for the sublicensee's compliance.
For trade mark licences, quality control provisions are critical: the licensor must maintain the right to monitor and approve the licensee's use of the trade mark and the quality of associated goods or services, to preserve the trade mark's distinctiveness and the licensor's goodwill.
The licence agreement should address ownership of improvements or developments made by the licensee during the licence term. Common arrangements include: improvements owned by the licensor ("grant-back" provisions), improvements owned by the licensee, and joint ownership of improvements. Grant-back provisions may have competition law implications (discussed below) and should be drafted carefully.
The licensor typically warrants that it has the right to grant the licence, that the licensed IP does not infringe third-party rights (to the best of the licensor's knowledge), and that the licensed IP is valid and subsisting. The licensee may require an indemnity from the licensor for third-party IP infringement claims. The licensor typically limits or excludes liability for indirect and consequential losses.
The licence agreement should specify its duration and the circumstances in which either party may terminate. Termination rights typically include: termination for material breach (with a cure period), automatic termination on insolvency, and termination on change of control of the licensee. The consequences of termination (return of confidential information, cessation of use of trade marks, outstanding royalty payments) should be addressed in detail.
IP licence agreements in Hong Kong must comply with the Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619). Provisions in IP licences that may raise competition law concerns include:
IP licences that raise competition law concerns should be reviewed by legal counsel before execution.
IP licence agreements involving Hong Kong parties commonly provide for Hong Kong law to govern the agreement, given Hong Kong's well-developed IP law and the availability of experienced IP lawyers and adjudicators. Dispute resolution may be by litigation in the Hong Kong courts or by arbitration (typically HKIAC administered). Arbitration is generally preferred for confidential matters or for licences involving parties from multiple jurisdictions where cross-border enforcement of arbitral awards may be more straightforward.
Alan Wong LLP advises IP owners, licensors, and licensees on all aspects of IP licensing transactions in Hong Kong. Our services include drafting and negotiating IP licence agreements across all categories of IP, trade mark and patent recording with the Hong Kong registries, competition law review of licence terms, IP portfolio management, licence audits and royalty disputes, and advising on the IP aspects of commercial transactions such as M&A and joint ventures.
We advise clients across diverse industries including technology, retail, pharmaceutical, media, and financial services, and have experience of both simple single-IP licences and complex multi-territory IP licensing arrangements.
Contact us to discuss your IP licensing needs.
A guide to offshore pension and retirement planning options for Hong Kong residents, covering QROPS, international SIPP schemes, overseas pension transfers, and tax and estate planning considerations.
A legal guide to supply chain agreements and international trade contracts governed by Hong Kong law, covering key contractual provisions, risk allocation, Incoterms, trade finance, and dispute resolution.